<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: my ignorance revealed: spending freeze edition</title> <atom:link href="http://www.manifestdensity.net/2010/01/26/my-ignorance-revealed-spending-freeze-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.manifestdensity.net/2010/01/26/my-ignorance-revealed-spending-freeze-edition/</link> <description>Just another WordPress weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:04:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.manifestdensity.net/2010/01/26/my-ignorance-revealed-spending-freeze-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-8418</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:45:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manifestdensity.net/?p=1198#comment-8418</guid> <description>I&#039;m sympathetic to what you&#039;re saying. If our leaders don&#039;t start telling the public that up is up (not down, as Glenn Beck has told them!), how will we ever keep our society from falling apart?
I don&#039;t have an answer to that.  But I guess I&#039;m too worried by the immediate problems before us to begrudge Obama&#039;s efforts to find a clever way out of these superficial political problems.  It now sounds like there will be a jobs bill before the spending freeze, and that the spending freeze will barely amount to anything anyway.  If it splits the opposition and gains back some political capital, I think I&#039;m for it.  But I agree that it&#039;s pretty frustrating.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sympathetic to what you&#8217;re saying. If our leaders don&#8217;t start telling the public that up is up (not down, as Glenn Beck has told them!), how will we ever keep our society from falling apart?</p><p>I don&#8217;t have an answer to that.  But I guess I&#8217;m too worried by the immediate problems before us to begrudge Obama&#8217;s efforts to find a clever way out of these superficial political problems.  It now sounds like there will be a jobs bill before the spending freeze, and that the spending freeze will barely amount to anything anyway.  If it splits the opposition and gains back some political capital, I think I&#8217;m for it.  But I agree that it&#8217;s pretty frustrating.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.manifestdensity.net/2010/01/26/my-ignorance-revealed-spending-freeze-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-8387</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:16:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manifestdensity.net/?p=1198#comment-8387</guid> <description>Or maybe I am just tired of leaders who seemingly share my beliefs, but simply don&#039;t have the backbone needed to stand up for them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe I am just tired of leaders who seemingly share my beliefs, but simply don&#8217;t have the backbone needed to stand up for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.manifestdensity.net/2010/01/26/my-ignorance-revealed-spending-freeze-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-8386</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:10:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.manifestdensity.net/?p=1198#comment-8386</guid> <description>The largest source of my outrage doesn&#039;t come from the economics or politics of the situation, so much as the ethical implications raised by the Barack Obama&#039;s choice to promote a spending freeze.
Common wisdom says the government should tighten its belt during a recession. However, all reasonable economic consensus indicates that deficit spending is an effective tool to stimulate an economy, and is one of the few available to the administration at this time. Economic consensus predicts that following common wisdom and cutting government spending carries a high risk of stalling any economic and job growth, and possibly even deepening the recession.
So faced with what is possibly the clearest possible situation of common wisdom being at odds with reality, what does Barack Obama plan to do? Will he follow the responsible course of action and try to educate the american people despite the potential for personal loss? No. Will he take the arguably cowardly course of action and try to avoid the subject or pass the buck onto another branch of government? No. Instead Obama looks to profit in the short term by giving the American people exactly what they want, even though he knows that the proposed course of action carries unreasonable risk over the long term.
It seems like the mantra of &quot;first, do no harm&quot; should apply equally to those operating the levers of power as those operating with scalpels, and in this case Barack Obama is proposing a plan that he must know is likely to do harm. I&#039;m fairly certain that &quot;I just did what the patient asked for&quot; is not a valid defense in a medical malpractice lawsuit, and similarly should not be able to be used in justifying legislation or public policy.
In summary, the American people are demanding an unnecessary treatment with severe long-term health risks, and it is Barack Obama&#039;s professional responsibility as the primary physician to not carry out the operation. Doing so would be a breach of his oath, ethical obligations, and the expectations of voters like myself.
Primum non nocere.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The largest source of my outrage doesn&#8217;t come from the economics or politics of the situation, so much as the ethical implications raised by the Barack Obama&#8217;s choice to promote a spending freeze.</p><p>Common wisdom says the government should tighten its belt during a recession. However, all reasonable economic consensus indicates that deficit spending is an effective tool to stimulate an economy, and is one of the few available to the administration at this time. Economic consensus predicts that following common wisdom and cutting government spending carries a high risk of stalling any economic and job growth, and possibly even deepening the recession.</p><p>So faced with what is possibly the clearest possible situation of common wisdom being at odds with reality, what does Barack Obama plan to do? Will he follow the responsible course of action and try to educate the american people despite the potential for personal loss? No. Will he take the arguably cowardly course of action and try to avoid the subject or pass the buck onto another branch of government? No. Instead Obama looks to profit in the short term by giving the American people exactly what they want, even though he knows that the proposed course of action carries unreasonable risk over the long term.</p><p>It seems like the mantra of &#8220;first, do no harm&#8221; should apply equally to those operating the levers of power as those operating with scalpels, and in this case Barack Obama is proposing a plan that he must know is likely to do harm. I&#8217;m fairly certain that &#8220;I just did what the patient asked for&#8221; is not a valid defense in a medical malpractice lawsuit, and similarly should not be able to be used in justifying legislation or public policy.</p><p>In summary, the American people are demanding an unnecessary treatment with severe long-term health risks, and it is Barack Obama&#8217;s professional responsibility as the primary physician to not carry out the operation. Doing so would be a breach of his oath, ethical obligations, and the expectations of voters like myself.</p><p>Primum non nocere.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.464 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 01:28:01 -->

